ETF Overlap Tool: QQQM vs VGT
Compare portfolio holdings overlap, tech concentration risk, and expense ratio differences between Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares (VGT).
Stock Holdings Breakdown (QQQM vs VGT)
76 Assets| Asset | Sector | QQQM Weight | VGT Weight | Combined (50/50) | Status |
|---|
QQQM vs VGT: Portfolio Overlap & Investment Strategy Guide
When evaluating Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) versus Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund ETF Shares (VGT), investors are comparing two distinct ETF strategies. QQQM holds 101 total assets while VGT contains 317 total assets. Across both portfolios, they share 24 common stock holdings, representing a 49.6% portfolio overlap by weight.
Sector Concentration & Shared Stock Holdings
While both funds invest in equity markets, their internal sector allocations create meaningful differences in portfolio performance and volatility:
- Primary Sector Focus: QQQM concentrates its largest allocation in Information Technology (58.71%), whereas VGT allocates its highest weighting to Information Technology (99.15%).
- Top Shared Holdings: Key overlapping stocks held in both funds include NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), Apple Inc (AAPL), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT), Micron Technology, Inc (MU).
- Holdings Distribution: QQQM features 101 holdings compared to 317 holdings in VGT, affecting single-stock concentration risk.
Strategic Portfolio Insight: Moderate Overlap & Balanced Dual Exposure
Combining QQQM and VGT creates a moderate portfolio overlap of 49.6% by weight. While they share 24 common holdings, each ETF offers distinct sector weightings and strategy tilts that can complement a broader asset allocation strategy.
Expense Ratio Comparison & Performance: QQQM vs VGT
Beyond portfolio holdings overlap, fund management fees, dividend yields, and sector diversification play a vital role in long-term compounding returns:
1. Annual Management Fee Impact
VGT charges a lower expense ratio of 0.09% compared to QQQM at 0.15%. VGT is 1.7x cheaper, saving long-term investors approximately $6 per year for every $100,000 invested.
2. Volatility, Risk & Long-Term Growth Potential
QQQM and VGT react differently to changing interest rates, market cycles, and sector rotations. Diversifying across funds with different underlying indexes helps reduce portfolio drawdown risk during broader market corrections.
Snowball Portfolio Lab Insight
Want to analyze how combining QQQM and VGT impacts your total portfolio yield, sector distribution, and historical dividend income? Model your custom asset allocation in the Snowball Analytics Portfolio Lab.
- Sector Focus: QQQM's largest sector is Information Technology (58.71%), whereas VGT's largest sector is Information Technology (99.15%).
- Expense Ratio: VGT has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while QQQM charges 0.15%. VGT is 1.7x cheaper than QQQM.
- Portfolio Breadth: QQQM holds 101 total stocks vs VGT's 317 stocks.