ETF Overlap Tool: DGRW vs SCHD
Compare portfolio holdings overlap, dividend growth strategy differences, and expense ratios between WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD).
Stock Holdings Breakdown (DGRW vs SCHD)
73 Assets| Asset | Sector | DGRW Weight | SCHD Weight | Combined (50/50) | Status |
|---|
DGRW vs SCHD: Portfolio Overlap & Investment Strategy Guide
When evaluating WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) versus Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD), investors are comparing two distinct ETF strategies. DGRW holds 0 total assets while SCHD contains 0 total assets. Across both portfolios, they share 8 common stock holdings, representing a 14.9% portfolio overlap by weight.
Sector Concentration & Shared Stock Holdings
While both funds invest in equity markets, their internal sector allocations create meaningful differences in portfolio performance and volatility:
- Primary Sector Focus: DGRW concentrates its largest allocation in Information Technology (30.32%), whereas SCHD allocates its highest weighting to Healthcare (21.72%).
- Top Shared Holdings: Key overlapping stocks held in both funds include Abbott Laboratories (ABT), Merck & Co., Inc (MRK), The Coca-Cola Company (KO), The Home Depot, Inc (HD).
- Holdings Distribution: DGRW features 0 holdings compared to 0 holdings in SCHD, affecting single-stock concentration risk.
Strategic Portfolio Insight: Low Overlap & Strong Complementary Diversification
Holding both DGRW and SCHD offers low portfolio duplication with only a 14.9% weight overlap. With 8 shared stocks, these two funds focus on different market segments, making them highly complementary for investors seeking targeted multi-asset diversification.
Expense Ratio Comparison & Performance: DGRW vs SCHD
Beyond portfolio holdings overlap, fund management fees, dividend yields, and sector diversification play a vital role in long-term compounding returns:
1. Annual Management Fee Impact
SCHD charges a lower expense ratio of 0.06% compared to DGRW at 0.28%. SCHD is 4.7x cheaper, saving long-term investors approximately $22 per year for every $100,000 invested.
2. Volatility, Risk & Long-Term Growth Potential
DGRW and SCHD react differently to changing interest rates, market cycles, and sector rotations. Diversifying across funds with different underlying indexes helps reduce portfolio drawdown risk during broader market corrections.
Snowball Portfolio Lab Insight
Want to analyze how combining DGRW and SCHD impacts your total portfolio yield, sector distribution, and historical dividend income? Model your custom asset allocation in the Snowball Analytics Portfolio Lab.
- Sector Focus: DGRW's largest sector is Information Technology (30.32%), whereas SCHD's largest sector is Healthcare (21.72%).
- Expense Ratio: SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06%, while DGRW charges 0.28%. SCHD is 4.7x cheaper than DGRW.
- Portfolio Breadth: DGRW holds 0 total stocks vs SCHD's 0 stocks.