ETF Overlap Tool: VBR vs AVUV
Compare portfolio holdings overlap, small-cap value factor strategy differences, and expense ratios between Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund ETF Shares (VBR) and Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV).
Stock Holdings Breakdown (VBR vs AVUV)
73 Assets| Asset | Sector | VBR Weight | AVUV Weight | Combined (50/50) | Status |
|---|
VBR vs AVUV: Portfolio Overlap & Investment Strategy Guide
When evaluating Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund ETF Shares (VBR) versus Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV), investors are comparing two distinct ETF strategies. VBR holds 0 total assets while AVUV contains 0 total assets. Across both portfolios, they share 0 common stock holdings, representing a 0.0% portfolio overlap by weight.
Sector Concentration & Shared Stock Holdings
While both funds invest in equity markets, their internal sector allocations create meaningful differences in portfolio performance and volatility:
- Primary Sector Focus: VBR concentrates its largest allocation in Financials (17.99%), whereas AVUV allocates its highest weighting to Financials (27.46%).
- Top Shared Holdings: Key overlapping stocks held in both funds include key market leaders across both funds.
- Holdings Distribution: VBR features 0 holdings compared to 0 holdings in AVUV, affecting single-stock concentration risk.
Strategic Portfolio Insight: Low Overlap & Strong Complementary Diversification
Holding both VBR and AVUV offers low portfolio duplication with only a 0.0% weight overlap. With 0 shared stocks, these two funds focus on different market segments, making them highly complementary for investors seeking targeted multi-asset diversification.
Expense Ratio Comparison & Performance: VBR vs AVUV
Beyond portfolio holdings overlap, fund management fees, dividend yields, and sector diversification play a vital role in long-term compounding returns:
1. Annual Management Fee Impact
VBR charges a lower expense ratio of 0.07% compared to AVUV at 0.25%. VBR is 3.6x cheaper, saving long-term investors approximately $18 per year for every $100,000 invested.
2. Volatility, Risk & Long-Term Growth Potential
VBR and AVUV react differently to changing interest rates, market cycles, and sector rotations. Diversifying across funds with different underlying indexes helps reduce portfolio drawdown risk during broader market corrections.
Snowball Portfolio Lab Insight
Want to analyze how combining VBR and AVUV impacts your total portfolio yield, sector distribution, and historical dividend income? Model your custom asset allocation in the Snowball Analytics Portfolio Lab.
- Sector Focus: VBR's largest sector is Financials (17.99%), whereas AVUV's largest sector is Financials (27.46%).
- Expense Ratio: VBR has an expense ratio of 0.07%, while AVUV charges 0.25%. VBR is 3.6x cheaper than AVUV.
- Portfolio Breadth: VBR holds 0 total stocks vs AVUV's 0 stocks.